Palio CAT

Palio CAT reviews and ratings on this table tennis blade.

Upload an Image

Must be logged in
No watermarks on image
Will show after being validated

Approx. $ 22 USD

Update Price

Price $

Facebook

Ratings (rated 1 times)

From manufacturer:

Speed	8.0 /
Control	9.0 /
Weight	70g

From community:

Speed	8.0
Control	9.0
Stiffness $<b>Stiffness</b> refers to the blade\'s flexibility. Flexible blades have a longer dwell time, generating more spin. They also perform well for mid-distance looping. Stiff blades are better for smashing.$	5.0 - Average
Hardness $<b>Hardness</b> refers to the blade\'s hardness. Hard blades are often faster, and soft are generally slower. Soft blades have a longer dwell time, generating more spin.$	5.2 - Medium
Consistency	(not rated)
Overall	8.0

Plies	5
Materials	Balsa + carbon
Head Thickness	6mm
Head Dimensions
Handle Dimensions

Description of Palio CAT

Experienced coach from China said : "Because of the super light carbon blade, this amazing blade allows player to position their paddle at ready position at all time". It allows player to move faster on the playing field. If your arms or your wrist suffered from injuries or chronic pain, this maybe the perfect blade for you due to reduced weight without sacrificing speed and control.

Reviews of the Palio CAT

ThierryT said this on April 10, 2012:

Very light, mine is 66gr.
A very good blade at a fair price but not as good as the galaxy T11/T11+.
however it is much more thinner than the T11/T11+.

Facebook

Rate the Palio CAT

Review this Product

You must be logged in to leave a review/rating.
Log in / Create an account

Discussions (Not Reviews)

Other Palio Blades

B1 / B2 / B3 / C1 / C2 / C3 / C5 / C6 / C88 / KA / KC2 / M2 / Outer Fiber OF-001 / Outer Fiber OF-002 / Outer Fiber OF-003 / Outer Fiber OF-004 / Outer Fiber OF-005 / T5 / T7 / T92 / TC6 / TCT / TN Dual Carbon / TOM / TT (Carbon)

* Actual prices will vary.

DISCLAIMER: Ratings/reviews are contributed by the table tennis community.
Table Tennis Database does not certify their correctness.

Report a Bug