DHS Tin Arc
Double Happiness (DHS) Tin Arc reviews and ratings on this inverted table tennis rubber.
|
Ratings (rated 14 times)There are 3 users using the DHS Tin Arc. From manufacturer:
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of DHS Tin Arc
Sponge hardness: 37 degrees
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reviews of the DHS Tin Arc Anonymous said this on July 13, 2011:
Although this is a forehand rubber,it is also a very good backhand rubber Anonymous said this on September 27, 2011:
TinARC rubber is equipped with new high-elasticity sponge, which adopts extreme technique with innovative concept, creates acceleration during striking. The surface layer of rubber uses unique technique which makes it 'sticky & roughness'. In addition, the pimple is specially designed for speedy. The combination of these two techniques brings excellent ball speed & spin. The top players wo are in pursuit of excellent power and speed, as well as spin all prefer this brand new TinArc rubber. Anonymous said this on November 14, 2011:
Nice Rubber.. It can produce a very loud sound, it has a medium low throw, not too fast but fast enough too end the game.. i have a 37d red 2.0 and i think its a bit softer than black tinarc 3 37d 2.0 overall i like this rubber icontek said this on December 31, 2011:
A great modern speed glue effect rubber from China. The sponge is very ESN/Tensor, but the whole package plays in a way that is more predictable throughout a range of topspins. TA is predictable through and works well enough from close all the way to mid distance. It also provides a lot more punch on medium topspins than classic chinese rubber. Very modern. Much better than classic euro, japanese or chinese rubber in terms of spin to speed ratio.
AndySmith said this on September 24, 2012:
Excellent do-it-all rubber from DHS. DHS's traditional rubber line-up is incredibly focussed - tacky rubbers for the forehand. With Tin Arc, they've produced a great all-round offensive rubber that can do just about anything you want it to do.
Almost non-tacky, it plays like many of the classic japanese rubbers you used back in the day (Sriver, Mark V, etc), but with more spin, and a touch more speed and throw. It's a bit heavier than the classics though. It can fit with a chinese brush-loop or euro loop style. No real weak points - quality control seems great too. In fact, are DHS even making this themselves? :-) If you are looking for an upgrade on classic rubbers and don't like the feel of tensors - check this out. amekun said this on December 20, 2012:
i think the stats are too low
this is a great forehand rubber i can play short and long games FH Flicks are easier serves are spinny hmmm blocks are a little bit disappointing, you still need to push your blocks even if the ball is loaded wid topspin |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate the DHS Tin Arc |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discussions (Not Reviews) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other DHS Rubbers6512 / C 7 / C 8 / DHS H3 Provincial 22# Blue Spongy Table Tennis Rubber / Dipper / Dipper 2 / Dipper 3 / G555 / G666 / G777 / G888 / Gold Arc / Gold Arc 3 / Hurricane 2 (H2) / Hurricane 2 (No. 19 Sponge) / Hurricane 2 National (Signature) / Hurricane 3 (H3) / Hurricane 3 (H3) Pro (Tuned) / Hurricane 3 (National) / Hurricane 3 (No. 19 Sponge) / Hurricane 3 (Provincial) / Hurricane 3 National (Blue Sponge) / Hurricane 3 National (Orange Sponge) / Ma Long / Magician / Memo / Memo 2 / Memo 3 / NEO Hurricane 2 / NEO Hurricane 3 / NEO Hurricane 3 National (Blue Sponge) / NEO Hurricane 3 Provincial (Orange Sponge) / NEO Skyline 2 TG2 / NEO Skyline 3 TG3 / PF4 / PF4-1 / Skyline TG2 / Skyline TG2 (No. 19 Sponge) / Skyline TG3 / Skyline TG3 (No. 21 Blue Sponge) / Tin Arc 3 / TNT |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
product
* Actual prices will vary.
DISCLAIMER: Ratings/reviews are contributed by the table tennis community.
Table Tennis Database does not certify their correctness.
DISCLAIMER: Ratings/reviews are contributed by the table tennis community.
Table Tennis Database does not certify their correctness.



Anonymous said this on July 13, 2011:
Report a Bug




help